After more than a year of packed public hearings, yard signs, late-night meetings, and a complete restart of the approval process, Harrisonburg City Council voted 3-2 on Tuesday night to approve the rezoning that allows The Lindsey to move forward. The project, which most residents know as "The Link," will bring a four-story mixed-use apartment building to the current Lindsey Funeral Home property at the entrance of historic downtown on South Main Street.
It is one of the most debated development decisions in the Friendly City in recent memory, and the community is still processing it. Here is a breakdown of what was approved, who said what, and what this means for Harrisonburg going forward.
What Is The Lindsey?
The Lindsey is a mixed-use apartment development proposed by Timberwolf Capital Partners, a Wyoming-based real estate firm. The project would sit on ten parcels along South Main and South Liberty Streets near City Hall, on the site where Lindsey Funeral Home currently operates.
The version that was ultimately approved is significantly scaled back from the original proposal. Here is how it compares:
- Height: Reduced from six stories (75 feet) to four stories (52 feet)
- Units: Reduced from up to 265 units to a maximum of 180
- Bedrooms: Reduced from 555 to 440
- Parking: Reduced from 480 spaces to 320
- Commercial space: Added 2,500 to 5,000 square feet of ground-floor retail or business space
The project required the city to rezone the parcels from R-3 (medium-density residential) to B-1C (central business district zoning). That rezoning is what Council approved Tuesday night.
Approximately 75 percent of the units are four-bedroom apartments, which critics and even some former supporters say indicates the building is designed primarily as off-campus student housing for James Madison University rather than as housing for a broader mix of residents.
The Council Vote
The final vote was 3-2:
- Yes: Councilwoman Laura Dent, and Council members Abe Alsaadun and Fleming
- No: Mayor Deanna Reed and Councilwoman Monica Robinson
It was the third time City Council formally reviewed the case. The council first heard the proposal in August 2025, when a public hearing stretched past midnight and the project was tabled. The city was then required to restart the entire public process after failing to publish a required public notice. The Planning Commission recommended approval 5-1 in March 2026. Council tabled the project again in April 2026. The Planning Commission took up the revised design in July 2026 and reached a 3-3 stalemate, sending the project to Council without a favorable recommendation. Tuesday's vote was the conclusion of that long road.
The Case for The Lindsey
Supporters of the project, both on the council and in the community, pointed to a consistent set of arguments throughout the process.
Harrisonburg Cannot Sprawl Forever
The most pointed argument from the yes votes centered on the city's geography. Harrisonburg is landlocked, surrounded by Rockingham County, and has limited room to grow outward. Infill development, the argument goes, is not optional. It is the only path to keeping residents, businesses, and tax revenue inside city limits rather than watching them drift to the county.
Councilwoman Laura Dent made the case bluntly Tuesday night: "Harrisonburg is a city. We need to grow inward and, to some degree, upward, or we keep losing the people and the revenues and all of the infrastructure to the county. The county is building circles around us. We are landlocked. We need to grow inward, and I'd like to see even more upward expansion."
Downtown Needs More Foot Traffic
Small business owners were among the most vocal supporters throughout the process. Sarah Baker-McEvilly, owner of BMC Bakes on North Main Street, put the math in simple terms during an earlier public hearing: "A large part of owning a business is realizing just how much of a difference a small number of people can make. In three years, my highest grossing day came from serving just 100 people. Now, we are talking about a development that would add 600 more people."
Peter Denbigh, founder of the Harrisonburg Innovation Hub, framed the question not as whether growth is coming, but where it lands: "I really hope that we don't chase this opportunity. I believe downtown is going to change. My question is not if Harrisonburg grows, it's whether that growth strengthens the heart of our city or gets pushed to the perimeter while our downtown businesses are left needing more people through their doors."
The City's Own Long-Term Plan Calls for This
Todd Rhea, the attorney representing Timberwolf Capital Partners, argued throughout the process that The Lindsey aligns directly with Harrisonburg's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which sets increasing residential density in the city center as a primary goal. "Downtown Harrisonburg has highly inconsistent foot traffic patterns and limited parking," Rhea said. "The Lindsey would bring almost 500 new residents of any type within walking distance of downtown businesses, and creating a visual waypoint to draw people from campus to downtown is invaluable." He added: "The Lindsey property should be an economic engine for the city, not a vacant space frozen in time."
JMU Is Growing
JMU's recently approved Madison Promise initiative plans to expand the university's campus occupancy by 60 percent by 2040. Supporters argued that this kind of enrollment growth makes additional housing near campus a necessity, not a luxury. Deputy Director of Community Development Thanh Dang noted that the university's growth plans were incorporated into the developer's analysis, though city staff acknowledged the impact of JMU's planned on-campus housing expansion would be felt differently in different parts of the city.
The Case Against The Lindsey
Opposition to the project was visible and sustained throughout the entire year-plus process. Dozens of "No B1C" yard signs dotted lawns across the downtown neighborhoods, and public hearings repeatedly drew crowds that stretched the council chambers to capacity.
The Gateway Argument
The most consistent opposition argument was about what a four-story building at the entrance to historic downtown Harrisonburg would mean for the city's identity and sense of place. Ellen Hopkins, who lives near the south end of downtown, said it plainly at an earlier hearing: "We have only one Main Street that brings the community and visitors through our historic downtown. If you allow such drastic changes as a six-story apartment building at its entry point, you will fundamentally change Harrisonburg, but perhaps not in the way that you intend."
Cannie Graham echoed the concern at Tuesday's meeting: "We already have an extraordinary concentration of student housing. We need to be asking whether continuing to build more large-scale student housing is really the highest and best use of a limited land, particularly in one of the gateways to our city. Because once we change that gateway we don't get it back."
Mostly Student Housing, Not Workforce or Family Housing
A significant shift in the opposition came when Timberwolf revised the project from six stories to four. The reduced building ended up with approximately 75 percent four-bedroom units, a design that critics say is clearly targeted at undergraduate students rather than the broader mix of residents the original plan implied.
Planning Commissioner Randy Seitz, who had previously supported the project, withdrew his support over this revision: "The reconsideration of this has been an exercise in being careful what you wish for. I agree with the assessment that this is a housing development targeting undergraduate student residents. I don't think Harrisonburg needs more student housing."
Fellow Commissioner Rob Jezior made a similar turn: "If you have a unit filled with 77 percent students versus a 50-50 split, that building is going to have a much different feel. It's going to be much more of a dorm than it is going to be a community-focused building, bringing young professionals and families that need the two- and three-bedroom units in."
Traffic and Infrastructure Concerns
Neighbors in the Oldtown and adjacent downtown neighborhoods repeatedly raised concerns about what several hundred new residents would mean for traffic on roads that many already find congested. Jeff Roy, an Oldtown resident, challenged the adequacy of the proffers offered to offset those impacts: "The proffers offered aren't going to mitigate our traffic problems, and the taxpayers are going to pay for it. Saying that we are going to come back and fix the problem later when we figure out what exactly those problems are going to be is not going to take away from the fact that we, as taxpayers, are going to pay to fix that."
Some also criticized the city's traffic impact study, which was conducted in January, arguing it did not accurately account for the effect of students on that stretch of downtown.
JMU's New On-Campus Housing Changes the Math
Several opponents pointed to JMU President James Schmidt's announcement of plans to build new on-campus housing capacity for up to 10,000 students. If JMU significantly reduces the number of students living off campus, that shift could undercut the demand assumptions The Lindsey's approval rested on. Lin Adams, a Harrisonburg resident of 45 years, raised the question of what happens to a building like The Lindsey if Timberwolf sells the project and market conditions change: the proffers and commitments that came with approval cannot always travel with a new owner.
Affordable Housing Gap
One concern that appeared across both sides of the debate was the project's limited contribution to affordable housing. Revised proffers reduced several earlier commitments, including donations toward affordable housing and traffic-calming measures. Planning Commission Vice Chair Shannon Porter, who voted against the recommendation in March, had specifically called for stronger affordability provisions. Resident Sam Nickels, who supported the project, also acknowledged the broader challenge, noting that a lack of housing at all price points creates a domino effect that hits lower-income residents the hardest.
Mayor Reed and Councilwoman Robinson Vote No
Mayor Deanna Reed had been transparent about her reservations throughout the process. As far back as April, she stated publicly that if forced to vote that night, she would vote no. Tuesday's outcome confirmed she held that position. Councilwoman Monica Robinson similarly cited unresolved concerns as the basis for her no vote.
A Decision That Has Been Building for Over a Year
It is worth stepping back to appreciate how long and winding this process was. The proposal first came before City Council in August 2025. That initial hearing ran past midnight. The project was delayed while city staff gathered more information. Then the city discovered it had failed to publish a required public notice and was forced to restart the entire formal process from scratch. The Planning Commission took it up again in March 2026, recommending approval 5-1. Council tabled it in April. The revised design went back to the Planning Commission in July, where it deadlocked 3-3. Then, finally, Tuesday night.
More than a year of community input, redesigns, proffers, yard signs, and standing-room public hearings. The result was the same margin that approved the Bluestone Town Center development years ago: 3-2.
What This Means for Downtown Harrisonburg
For those of us who work in Harrisonburg real estate, this decision carries implications worth watching closely.
Downtown Harrisonburg has been on a slow but real revitalization trajectory for years. Local restaurants, shops, and creative businesses have invested in a downtown core that draws both residents and visitors. More foot traffic, if it comes, could strengthen that ecosystem. The concern is whether a building designed primarily around four-bedroom student units delivers the kind of year-round, engaged downtown resident that small businesses are counting on, or whether it delivers a seasonal occupancy pattern tied to the academic calendar.
On the neighborhood side, the blocks immediately surrounding the project are a mix of historic homes and smaller-scale residential uses. What a 180-unit building at the entrance of downtown does to parking patterns, street character, and the broader housing market in those adjacent blocks is a real question. Changes at that scale at a gateway location tend to ripple outward.
From a broader market perspective, the approval signals that Harrisonburg city leadership is willing to approve density increases in the core when developers bring projects that at least partially address community concerns. That is useful context for anyone watching where investment in Harrisonburg real estate is headed over the next decade.
The project is approved in the rezoning sense, but construction is still ahead. Those who supported it will be watching to see whether The Lindsey delivers on its promises for downtown economic activity. Those who opposed it will be watching the streets, the parking, and the character of the gateway block they fought to preserve.
Both groups care about the same city. The debate just revealed very different visions of what Harrisonburg should look like as it grows into itself.
Kline May Realty is a locally owned real estate firm serving buyers and sellers across the Harrisonburg and Shenandoah Valley region. Have questions about what development trends like this mean for your neighborhood or your home's value? Reach out to our team.
Posted by Kline May Realty on
Leave A Comment